MSI H97M-G43(MS-7924)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7924
MotherboardMSI H97M-G43(MS-7924)  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '17 at 15:01
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 193
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 377
50% 377 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 22.8
20% 22.4 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 19.2
19% 24.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 514
Write 454
Mixed 482
108% 483 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 13.4
90% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 72.8
DQ Mixed 58.9
76% 142 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
38GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 93.8
Write 60.9
Mixed 68.1
56% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.18
44% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 0215 CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-G43(MS-7924) Builds (Compare 545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI H97M-G43(MS-7924) - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $598
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback