Skikk Loki 15 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.03%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSkikk Loki 15 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardSKIKK.EU Loki AMD RTX 3070
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210831
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateMay 08 '23 at 08:25
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.03% Terrible
Memory 9.97
1-Core 13.9
2-Core 26.8
10% 16.9 Pts
4-Core 43.5
8-Core 79.5
7% 61.5 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 9.03%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1113) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 6.5
6% 6.7 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 4.2
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 325 362 370 356 358 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 447
Write 469
Mixed 438
SusWrite 362
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 5.4
18% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
783GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 358 389 439 404 404 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 507
Write 576
Mixed 594
SusWrite 405
118% 521 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 7.5
26% 7.87 MB/s
DQ Read 54.1
DQ Write 42.8
DQ Mixed 45.3
35% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C22 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.2
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.9
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 404
10% 404 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Loki 15 AMD Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

System: Skikk Loki 15 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback