TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B360M BAZOOKA (MS-7B24)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B24
MotherboardMSI B360M BAZOOKA (MS-7B24)  (all builds)
Memory18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 07 '23 at 01:40
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 528
65% 495 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 82.6%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
MSI(1462 7B24) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 80.7
Parallax 7.3
5% 31.4 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.92%
 Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
PNY(196E 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.7% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 80.6
Parallax 72.1
57% 74.1 fps
MRender 74.2
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 66
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 56.7%
 Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD360GB 360GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 94 47 53 34 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 460
Write 403
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 110
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 0.9
46% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 87.5
DQ Write 43.3
DQ Mixed 1.1
18% 44 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 40.4%
 Great: 80%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
89GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 96 98 97 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 95.2
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 60.1%
 Great: 109%
WD Red Pro 3TB (2014)-$76
3TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 170 173 168 169 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 160
Mixed 102
SusWrite 166
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 09D5 09D5 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.3
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B360M BAZOOKA (MS-7B24) Builds (Compare 5,233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360M BAZOOKA (MS-7B24)

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel  $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples2,260x
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples876x
Core i5-9400FIntel  $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples775x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples793x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples593x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples395x
SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD  $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples188x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples165x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples98x
RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples228x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 8,909 samples189x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples136x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback