TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 09 '22 at 00:07
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 74
2-Core 39.1
42% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 272
35% 265 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 53.9%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 5.6
3% 28.5 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.3
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 2.96%
 Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD360GB 360GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 322 36 5.4 23 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 363
Write 298
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 72
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 0.8
28% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 80.3
DQ Write 33
DQ Mixed 0.9
15% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 29.1%
 Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 31.4%
 Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples851x
Core i5-4570Intel  $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples769x
Core i7-4770Intel  $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples755x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples1,206x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples371x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples250x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples185x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples60x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples56x
RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples54x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples46x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples44x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback