Tarox Business G620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemTarox Business G620  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8H61-M LE/USB3
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '23 at 00:00
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 76
2-Core 153
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 238
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 20.1
17% 19.5 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200807
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 38 27 25 16 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
20GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 98.3
Mixed 54
SusWrite 69.8
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 70%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
135GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 83 85 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 86.7
Write 95
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 84
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR16N11/8 Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Business G620 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Tarox Business G620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback