Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 17:21
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9100F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 442
56% 424 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.5% Very good
Lighting 88.8
Reflection 88.5
Parallax 91
72% 89.4 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 79
Splatting 72.5
70% 87.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03150002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 81 4.4 53 55 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 391
Write 275
Mixed 270
SusWrite 45.9
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 1.5
65% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 119
91% 123 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
439GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 118 115 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 156
Write 41.7
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 117
62% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
344% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 10.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback