Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateApr 26 '23 at 17:44
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9100F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 86.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 460
60% 454 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.6% Very good
Lighting 89.4
Reflection 89.7
Parallax 82.4
73% 87.2 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 79.3
Splatting 71.1
69% 86.6 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03150002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 76 66 54 4.7 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 420
Write 275
Mixed 280
SusWrite 50.5
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 36
120% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 119
95% 134 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
379GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 127 129 122 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 131
Write 127
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 124
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback