Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '23 at 03:12
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9100F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100-$145 7,621 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 76.1 2-Core 239 71% 132 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 389 51% 383 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4013) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.5% Very good	Lighting 91.4 Reflection 90.9 Parallax 83.9 74% 88.7 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 78.9 Splatting 70.8 69% 86 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03150002 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 467 Write 310 Mixed 296 79% 358 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 26.5 4K Mixed 1.4 16% 9.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 121 82% 95.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 566GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 40 41 41 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Read 51.9 Write 39.2 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 39.4 31% 42.1 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.6 311% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x16GB 15,722 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	39.8% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 11.4 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	484x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	461x
Pentium Gold G5400Intel $55Bench 62%, 15,354 samples	56x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	282x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	113x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	103x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	112x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $34Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	61x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	46x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	49x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	28x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $123

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16