Asus STRIX B250H GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX B250H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '23 at 21:43
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 113
2-Core 182
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 510
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 32.6
Parallax 31.3
26% 31.9 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 31.3
Splatting 22
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SU800BR2-256GB 256GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 476
Write 437
Mixed 310
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 36.9
117% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 132
108% 158 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
797GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 177
Write 182
Mixed 85.9
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
835GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 173
Write 141
Mixed 85.9
99% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4641G8CK8I8HLSBG 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 20
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX B250H GAMING Builds (Compare 1,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus STRIX B250H GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback