Login LOG-Q370M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLogin LOG-Q370M-G  (all builds)
MotherboardLogin LOG-Q370M-G
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200421
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 19:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 296
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 1148
103% 870 Pts
64-Core 1,140
71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.5% Average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 53.9
51% 59.3 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 54.6
Splatting 54.3
47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SU800BR2-256GB 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0125A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 441 269 183 68 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 436
Mixed 394
SusWrite 232
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 42.9
144% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 243
194% 267 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
296GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 110 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 140
Write 122
Mixed 101
SusWrite 111
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P26KC8T1-BBPS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 24.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 27.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LOG-Q370M-G Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Login LOG-Q370M-G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback