Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 273% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 315% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	329% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	119.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 02 '23 at 21:27
Run Duration	285 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10940X 1,827 User benchmarks, average bench 86% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 75.3 1-Core 131 2-Core 260 84% 155 Pts	4-Core 515 8-Core 1,008 90% 761 Pts	64-Core 2,017 125% 2,017 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,800 25,956 User benchmarks, average bench 370% Nvidia(10DE 167C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.68 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	329% Outstanding	Lighting 488 Reflection 551 Parallax 756 398% 598 fps	MRender 520 Gravity 555 Splatting 304 360% 460 fps
Poor: 303% ↑ This bench: 329% Great: 407%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 169 155 147 148 143 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 1,484 Write 231 Mixed 414 SusWrite 163 124% 573 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 48.7 182% 68.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,045 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 480 402% 604 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 287GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 397 394 398 399 401 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 465 Mixed 393 SusWrite 397 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 48.4 176% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 358 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 134%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 63GB free Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 369 373 372 374 361 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 365 Write 382 Mixed 272 SusWrite 369 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 33.7 134% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 311 236% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 104%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 248GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1365 2103 2090 2096 2130 2142 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	313% Outstanding	Read 2046 Write 1,806 Mixed 1,255 SusWrite 1,988 399% 1,774 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 61.5 217% 80.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,128 DQ Write 800 DQ Mixed 953 715% 961 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 313% Great: 425%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 60GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 396 394 397 398 400 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 440 Mixed 379 SusWrite 396 95% 420 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 53.7 185% 67 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 357 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 163GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 396 393 366 355 368 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 405 Mixed 376 SusWrite 379 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 46.5 171% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 358 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 134%
Hitachi HUS728T8TALE6L4 8TB 1,005 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 4TB free Firmware: V8GNW980 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 180 182 181 185 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 128GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 35.7 MC Write 59.1 MC Mixed 36.8 125% 43.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 10.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	497x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	261x
Core i7-7740XIntel $240Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	148x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	169x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	152x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	93x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	61x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	56x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $796

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16