Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive6.88% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD7  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 01 '23 at 10:01
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 121
55% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 321
33% 268 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 200B) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 531.68
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.8% Average
Lighting 51.4
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 57.6
42% 56.2 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 56.2
48% 58.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 11 26 39 40 16 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
6.88% Terrible
Read 67.3
Write 34.1
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 25.5
8% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.1
8% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 6.88%
Great: 130%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$37
184GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 14 34 41 41 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 79.5
Write 54.3
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 28.5
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.4
112% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$37
1GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 91.8
Write 82.2
Mixed 60.1
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
308GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 62 60 61 58 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 29.3
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 54.5
37% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250823AS 250GB-$99
63GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 51 46 50 46 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 57.4
Write 39.2
Mixed 39
SusWrite 43.3
33% 44.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29%
Great: 37%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 480GB
144GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 15 16 14 3.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
Read 52.4
Write 29
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 12.7
23% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.8
784% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
856GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 15 15 14 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 50.8
Write 29.4
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 13.1
23% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
257% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 6 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.5% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD7 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback