Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700TE 21 User benchmarks, average bench 75% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 195 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 549 57% 460 Pts	64-Core 583 36% 583 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 2015) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.85% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 5.6 4% 5.47 fps	MRender 9.8 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 0.3 4% 5.67 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.85% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4256Q-A0 256GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBI01108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 881 862 691 636 593 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	178% Outstanding	Read 1306 Write 936 Mixed 888 SusWrite 758 217% 972 MB/s	4K Read 53.9 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 41 193% 68.6 MB/s	DQ Read 415 DQ Write 588 DQ Mixed 412 336% 472 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 233%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905700-118.A00G 2x8GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.6% Above average	MC Read 26 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 16.1 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 19.8 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-9700TEIntelBench 75%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples	1x

SSD
OM8SEP4256Q-A0 256GBKingstonBench 132%, 25 samples	1x

RAM
9905700-118.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 84%, 122 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16