_ _

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System_ _  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '19 at 07:56
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 239
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 761
74% 609 Pts
64-Core 752
47% 752 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 89%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.9% Poor
Lighting 31
Reflection 21.4
Parallax 26.2
25% 26.2 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 27.5
Splatting 26.6
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 709 687 671 634 640 623 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 797
Write 614
Mixed 641
SusWrite 661
152% 678 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 61.4
205% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,284
DQ Write 980
DQ Mixed 1,094
829% 1,120 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 186%
Great: 297%
SMI USB disk 8GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.5 6.3 6.3 5.8 5.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Read 8.8
Write 3.8
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5.7
7% 5.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4S-8G24H518C2 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 13.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical _ Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: _ _

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $56
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback