Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2V-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2V
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2V-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '23 at 18:43
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 198
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 303
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 34
Parallax 32.6
28% 33.5 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 34
Splatting 23.1
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Husky 1TB 1TB
526GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0915A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 399 422 282 3.9 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 502
Write 440
Mixed 378
SusWrite 242
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 26.4
126% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 43.6
85% 165 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
312GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 148 148 150 149 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 145
Write 140
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 148
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 23.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2V-CF Builds (Compare 998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2V-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback