Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite E45DW-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF40 06A2
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150807
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '23 at 01:37
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G 2,236 User benchmarks, average bench 36% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Memory 33.8 1-Core 48.7 2-Core 80.9 32% 54.5 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 127 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Toshiba(1179 F812) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.77% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 6.3 Parallax 6.8 4% 5.9 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 5.2 4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.77% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1003C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 117 294 320 328 334 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 316 Write 235 Mixed 122 SusWrite 269 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 9 54% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 31.2 66% 134 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB 30,280 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.5 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8GAMDBench 36%, 2,236 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	3x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 39%, 279 samples	1x