Toshiba Satellite E45DW-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite E45DW-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF40 06A2
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150807
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 17:04
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 35.9
2-Core 78.9
35% 56 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 124
15% 117 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Toshiba(1179 F812) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP2818E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 236 273 264 246 230 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 361
Write 199
Mixed 241
SusWrite 245
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 6.9
66% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 11.4
43% 92.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.8
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite E45DW-C Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite E45DW-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback