Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite E45DW-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF40 06A2
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150807
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '23 at 01:31
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G 2,236 User benchmarks, average bench 36% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 36.7 1-Core 47.9 2-Core 79.3 32% 54.6 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 120 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Toshiba(1179 F812) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.82% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 6 Parallax 6.4 4% 5.7 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 5.2 4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.82% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1003C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 292 301 298 325 337 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.3% Below average	Read 100 Write 190 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 265 33% 144 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 0.2 33% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 84.5 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 0.2 41% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB 30,280 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19% Very poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.5 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 218 18% 218 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8GAMDBench 36%, 2,236 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	3x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 39%, 279 samples	1x