Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	98.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X570-PRO (all builds)
Memory	53.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230223
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '23 at 17:40
Run Duration	306 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 70.6 1-Core 145 2-Core 288 89% 168 Pts	4-Core 553 8-Core 1,051 95% 802 Pts	64-Core 2,162 134% 2,162 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.61 Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.8% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 109 Parallax 125 98% 118 fps	MRender 172 Gravity 108 Splatting 100 100% 127 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB 553 User benchmarks, average bench 321% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1463 1370 1418 1455 1417 1376 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	307% Outstanding	Read 2,333 Write 2232 Mixed 1,758 SusWrite 1,416 434% 1,935 MB/s	4K Read 54.6 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 80.1 257% 90 MB/s	DQ Read 1,230 DQ Write 859 DQ Mixed 991 755% 1,027 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 307% Great: 399%
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 423GB free Firmware: 3106 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 640 Write 551 Mixed 552 130% 581 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 38.7 118% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 254 199% 275 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 208%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 931GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 468 Write 336 Mixed 438 92% 414 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 84 4K Mixed 52 171% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 185 143% 195 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 825GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 480 Write 405 Mixed 419 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 83.7 4K Mixed 51.5 169% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 198 149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 EVO 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0212 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 183 Write 166 Mixed 172 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 24.7 4K Mixed 17.7 65% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 30.1 DQ Write 30.7 DQ Mixed 26.5 21% 29.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 93%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 107 108 109 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 116 Write 56.2 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 107 66% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 100%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$235 4,534 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 7TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 126 126 129 134 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 186 Mixed 106 SusWrite 129 113% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 1.8 364% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 110%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 978GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 152 Write 133 Mixed 70.6 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 4x16GB 1,002 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.5% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 27.6 82% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 27.3 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $245Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	898x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $206Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	823x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	779x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	607x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	411x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	352x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	371x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	298x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	208x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	188x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	170x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	152x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,239

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16