HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8704
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '23 at 16:53
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 85.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 253
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 838
78% 648 Pts
64-Core 1,429
88% 1,429 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
Zotac(19DA 2696) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 278
Reflection 262
Parallax 282
227% 274 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 239
Splatting 189
206% 262 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 196%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,055
Write 1,100
Mixed 984
234% 1046 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 47.6
155% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 697
507% 664 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 219%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
823GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 174
Write 168
Mixed 97.1
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8HC-8X KHX3200C16D4/8GX HP32D4U8S8HC-8X KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 24.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 24.7
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $491
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback