Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH560
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateApr 20 '23 at 12:03
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 245
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 943
79% 681 Pts
64-Core 967
60% 967 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 200F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6589
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (120 fps cap detected)
97.3% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 120
Parallax 120
98% 120 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 120
Splatting 114
96% 118 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 144%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1589 1497 1437 1391 1395 1435 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2030
Write 1,882
Mixed 1,602
SusWrite 1,457
392% 1,743 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 70.3
230% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 1,058
DQ Mixed 1,166
878% 1,177 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 294%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 26.7
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 24.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 Builds (Compare 745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback