Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH560
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 04:47
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 227
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 647
65% 527 Pts
64-Core 885
55% 885 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 200F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6589
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 169
Parallax 149
117% 154 fps
MRender 156
Gravity 119
Splatting 110
103% 128 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 110%
Great: 144%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1514 1509 1467 1504 1512 1274 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,145
Write 1769
Mixed 1,595
SusWrite 1,464
391% 1743 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 65.8
220% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 821
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 737
549% 732 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 276%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 Builds (Compare 745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback