Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive299% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH560
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 05:10
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 74.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 255
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 871
84% 690 Pts
64-Core 931
58% 931 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 200F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6589
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 170
Parallax 153
124% 158 fps
MRender 160
Gravity 126
Splatting 113
106% 133 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 114%
Great: 144%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1593 1590 1518 1423 1419 1376 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 2,083
Write 1,804
Mixed 1,590
SusWrite 1,486
391% 1,741 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 72.4
235% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,284
DQ Write 1,042
DQ Mixed 1,162
870% 1,163 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 299%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.3% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 22.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 Builds (Compare 745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback