Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_A509FJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_A509FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509FJ
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 19:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 172
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 398
43% 340 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX230
Asus(1043 11AF) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1169
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 10.7
10% 14.1 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 13.2
Splatting 13.7
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN08MA22SCY256YMNV 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220625a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1021 814 276 313 322 243 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,342
Write 1,236
Mixed 1,040
SusWrite 498
230% 1,029 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 41.9
141% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 376
270% 345 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 143%
Great: 253%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
918GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 133 132 136 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 68
SusWrite 133
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 0A94 D4R4GS24A8R 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 10.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_A509FJ Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_A509FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback