Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 18:39
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Memory 24.3
1-Core 14.6
2-Core 28.2
15% 22.4 Pts
4-Core 47.3
8-Core 73.9
8% 60.6 Pts
64-Core 74.3
5% 74.3 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 407D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.6% Average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 65.9
33% 47.9 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 66.4
61% 75.6 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN08MA22SCY256YMNV 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220625a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 174 259 535 361 381 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 932
Write 968
Mixed 928
SusWrite 349
178% 794 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 18.2
59% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 73.4
DQ Mixed 86.8
65% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 253%
Apacer AS340 120GB
214GB free
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 104 146 70 55 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 374
Write 336
Mixed 159
SusWrite 106
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 13.2
47% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 100
75% 100 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
279GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 87 110 131 118 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 97.3
Write 133
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 116
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.BAGTC.AZ30B 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 14.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.4
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 290
14% 290 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback