Lenovo 20X2SBGJ00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20X2SBGJ00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20X2SBGJ00
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220228
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 18:40
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1145G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 46
1-Core 140
2-Core 248
75% 144 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 484
55% 433 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 508F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 19
Parallax 23.1
16% 20.7 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 15.8
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-8D256-Q79 256GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2V879
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 373 319 372 331 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 1,109
Write 294
Mixed 315
SusWrite 344
113% 516 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 8.2
57% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 11.4
12% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HEMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 8.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20X2SBGJ00 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20X2SBGJ00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback