Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9850H 9,974 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 81.7 1-Core 128 2-Core 247 84% 152 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 707 71% 575 Pts	64-Core 847 52% 847 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 860F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.51% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 43.7 Parallax 8.2 5% 19.3 fps	MRender 6.7 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 10.7 7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.51% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDEV1TB-D8 1TB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 215% 882GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0709E0L Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,514 Write 1,354 Mixed 827 273% 1,232 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 22.2 152% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 695 DQ Write 747 DQ Mixed 442 410% 628 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 317%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2667, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.1% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 10 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 12.6 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	443x
Quadro T2000NvidiaBench 43%, 3,549 samples	195x
Quadro T1000NvidiaBench 37%, 3,238 samples	162x

SSD
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 199%, 3,035 samples	95x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	86x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	84x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	253x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	89x
16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 2x16GBMicronBench 88%, 2,294 samples	27x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16