Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9850H 9,974 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 49.8 1-Core 112 2-Core 243 70% 135 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 650 66% 535 Pts	64-Core 723 45% 723 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 860F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.17% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 43.3 Parallax 6.4 5% 18.5 fps	MRender 6.2 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 9.3 6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.17% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDEV1TB-D8 1TB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 215% 802GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0709E0L Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 428 Write 549 Mixed 542 114% 506 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 6.6 22% 7.33 MB/s	DQ Read 421 DQ Write 570 DQ Mixed 362 311% 451 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 317%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2667, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	21.3% Poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 6.6 20% 7.17 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 4.3 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	445x
Quadro T2000NvidiaBench 43%, 3,549 samples	196x
Quadro T1000NvidiaBench 37%, 3,238 samples	163x

SSD
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 199%, 3,035 samples	96x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	86x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	84x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	255x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	89x
16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 2x16GBMicronBench 88%, 2,294 samples	28x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16