MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D54
MotherboardMSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54)  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateApr 18 '23 at 20:54
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 69.1
1-Core 171
2-Core 338
100% 193 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,131
108% 891 Pts
64-Core 2,148
133% 2,148 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3525 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 165
Parallax 154
139% 163 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 131
Splatting 113
112% 141 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 124%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 SATA 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LBFD16N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 148 100 101 101 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 464
Write 203
Mixed 179
SusWrite 119
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 28.1
94% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 156
123% 174 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
864GB free
Firmware: JC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 119 118 119 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 118
Write 110
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 117
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
377GB free
Firmware: DEM8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 107 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 94
Write 103
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 107
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.5
306% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 64%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
15GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 92 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 93
Write 95.3
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 89.9
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 109%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
2GB free
Firmware: 0103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 79.4
Write 79.2
Mixed 80.5
60% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 81%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500G 500GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 362
Write 364
Mixed 329
452% 352 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 24.8
1,945% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 42.9
DQ Mixed 32.5
2,662% 33.9 MB/s
Poor: 151% Great: 234%
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB
297GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.9% Average
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 120
126% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3H1 Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54) Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback