Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateApr 18 '23 at 19:25
Run Duration324 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 206
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 343
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.1% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 21.1
Parallax 37.7
32% 32.7 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 39
Splatting 33.9
30% 36.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 466
Mixed 428
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 48.4
156% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 356
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Elecgear NV-i9 256GB
128GB free
Firmware: 0205
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 82 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 352
Write 343
Mixed 290
SusWrite 82
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 23.9
76% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 149
114% 153 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 78%
USB3.0 250GB
61GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 83 84 86 85 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 383
Write 365
Mixed 356
SusWrite 83.6
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 26.8
87% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 157
116% 151 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 83%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 122
Write 123
Mixed 73.2
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
931GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 201 206 210 208 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 146
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 199
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
380% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
825GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 94
Write 92.7
Mixed 67
SusWrite 66
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
634GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 115 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 40.7
Write 55.8
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 117
50% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 174 171 167 167 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 85
Write 143
Mixed 69
SusWrite 166
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
216% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 90%
ICY BOX IB-366StU3+B 3TB
796GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 46 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 96.1
Write 96.9
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 44.7
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 102%
Patriot Memory 16GB
10GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 350
Write 24.7
Mixed 24.2
103% 133 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1
73% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 35%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
13GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 205
Write 137
Mixed 55.4
148% 132 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 6.7
541% 7.8 MB/s
DQ Read 11
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 8.9
670% 9.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 111%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 256GB-$43
123GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 9.5 9.8 7.8 9 9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 166
Write 0.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 8.5
32% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 3.4
155% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX 0215 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 KHX1600C10D3/8GX 0215 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback