MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D54
MotherboardMSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54)  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 17 '23 at 20:13
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 170
2-Core 335
101% 193 Pts
4-Core 651
8-Core 1,139
108% 895 Pts
64-Core 2070
128% 2070 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 98%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3525 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 172
Parallax 161
144% 170 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 136
Splatting 117
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 SATA 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LBFD16N
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 442
Write 194
Mixed 211
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 27.7
87% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 139
116% 170 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
910GB free
Firmware: JC49
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 119
Write 118
Mixed 62.8
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
377GB free
Firmware: DEM8
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.1
Write 116
Mixed 28.8
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.7
335% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 64%
WD WD10S21X-24R1BT0-SSHD-8GB 1TB
17GB free
Firmware: 03.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51
Write 84.3
Mixed 47.4
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
15GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 87.2
Write 94.4
Mixed 62
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
2GB free
Firmware: 0103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.4
Write 74.8
Mixed 81.3
62% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 81%
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB
297GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 54.3
Write 118
Mixed 35.7
94% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 48%
USB3.0 high speed 320GB
84GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96
Write 94.4
Mixed 63.3
106% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3H1 Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.9% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 19.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54) Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,246
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback