TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P9900  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110406
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 09 '23 at 20:55
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 161
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 377
44% 339 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 70.8%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 20.6
18% 20.1 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 17.4%
 Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 226 226 238 239 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.2% Good
Read 240
Write 232
Mixed 232
SusWrite 226
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 33.1
109% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 198
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 66.2%
 Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 195 189 194 192 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 182
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 188
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 110%
 Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HP698650-154-KEB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 12.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 39.6%
 Great: 57%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ESPRIMO P9900 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900

CPU
Core i5 650Intel  $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples23x
Core i7 870Intel  $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples15x
Core i5-750Intel  $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples7x
GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples8x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples7x
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples5x
SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung  $68Bench 104%, 60,851 samples5x
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GBBench 72%, 3,217 samples4x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples3x
RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 3 samples3x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 80AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 6 samples3x
HP698650-154-KEB 4x4GBUnknownBench 45%, 7 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback