Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39 33,019 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 141 61% 99.6 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 192 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760M 1,775 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Acer(1025 082E) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Lighting 11.9 Reflection 13.7 Parallax 14.5 10% 13.4 fps	MRender 15.1 Gravity 16.2 Splatting 12 12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY 240GB SATA SSD 240GB 495 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0218A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 199 185 211 230 117 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.5% Above average	Read 251 Write 223 Mixed 236 SusWrite 189 51% 225 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 19.3 87% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 86 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 31.1 52% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 95%
Jmicron Generic 1TB 3,310 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 77GB free Firmware: 0209 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 36 39 41 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	26% Poor	Read 51.3 Write 37.9 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 38.9 28% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
DDR3 1600 4G Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.2% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 15.8 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.3 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	7x
GTX 760MNvidiaBench 11%, 1,775 samples	2x

SSD
240GB SATA SSD 240GBPNYBench 71%, 495 samples	3x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $97Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	1x
NS100 512GBLexarBench 86%, 639 samples	1x

RAM
1600 4G Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GBDDR3Bench 48%, 3 samples	3x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 45%, 3,225 samples	2x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	2x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $39