Lenovo F0EL00A5LD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo F0EL00A5LD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3702
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 09 '23 at 00:04
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 58.9
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 195
64% 117 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 522
57% 451 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Legend(17AA 3702) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 6.6
5% 6.77 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 0.3
4% 5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LFM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 41 60 74 35 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 112
Write 105
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 57.3
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
100% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 71%
Generic External 1TB
73GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 52.9
Write 33
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 37.9
47% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.7
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0EL00A5LD Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0EL00A5LD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback