Genuine 15X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGenuine 15X  (all builds)
MotherboardGenuine Genuine 15X
Memory11.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200417
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateApr 08 '23 at 17:26
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 255
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 732
76% 610 Pts
64-Core 966
60% 966 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.5% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 54.7
46% 58.5 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 51
Splatting 49.7
44% 54.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,374
Write 1,729
Mixed 134
308% 1,412 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 78.1
269% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,118
DQ Write 779
DQ Mixed 572
529% 823 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
409GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1553 1541 1559 1122 541 532 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,599
Write 1,528
Mixed 1,200
SusWrite 1,142
307% 1,367 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 73.9
251% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 948
DQ Mixed 348
404% 688 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 250%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 8ATF2G64HZ-3G2E1 24GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 13.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15X Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Genuine 15X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback