Asus N501VW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAsus N501VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N501VW
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 07 '23 at 22:06
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 162
54% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 488
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1080) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.59% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 2.8
4% 8.63 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 7.8
5% 5.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.59%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2230 1TB SSD
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220902a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1115 805 1043 927 1061 1104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 916
Write 903
Mixed 906
SusWrite 1,009
211% 934 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 28.2
120% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 528
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 479
340% 437 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 153%
Great: 370%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
399GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4H0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 85.3
Write 80.5
Mixed 17.5
44% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.2
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N501VW Builds (Compare 425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N501VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback