Lenovo 11365K5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 11365K5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory45.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '23 at 19:42
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 132
54% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 452
43% 357 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
XFX(1682 6000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 150 130 118 43 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.3% Above average
Read 244
Write 221
Mixed 220
SusWrite 124
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 21.9
86% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 47.5
77% 149 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 92%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 226 227 216 220 229 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.8% Good
Read 240
Write 229
Mixed 226
SusWrite 224
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 38
116% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 176
138% 191 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386B4G70DM0- 2x24GB
2 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.4% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 11365K5 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 11365K5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback