HP ProLiant ML30 Gen9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ProLiant ML30 Gen9 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP ProLiant ML30 Gen9
Memory	22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180521
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '23 at 03:23
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6 441 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 73.1 2-Core 167 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 296 41% 302 Pts	64-Core 215 13% 215 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 851GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 405 331 312 395 377 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 414 Write 351 Mixed 359 SusWrite 368 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 46 162% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 306 236% 324 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 137%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 74GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 312 284 264 305 294 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 528 Mixed 440 SusWrite 321 102% 451 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 60.1 193% 68.1 MB/s	DQ Read 804 DQ Write 541 DQ Mixed 692 511% 679 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 280%
MB001000GWFWK 1TB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 508GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPG4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 32 30 33 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 161 Write 36.7 Mixed 42.9 SusWrite 34.1 50% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 114%
Seagate ST4000VN006-3CW104 4TB 597 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 174 154 137 178 162 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
UNKNOWN NOT AVAILABLE 2x16GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.6% Good	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 24.2 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 19.6 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProLiant ML30 Gen9 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML30 Gen9

CPU
Xeon E3-1220 v5IntelBench 73%, 1,202 samples	3x
Xeon E3-1220 v6IntelBench 75%, 441 samples	2x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	2x

SSD
PX-512S2C 512GBPlextorBench 86%, 304 samples	1x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	1x

RAM
NOT AVAILABLE HP 862689-091 16GBUNKNOWNBench 68%, 4 samples	2x
NOT AVAILABLE 2x4GBUNKNOWNBench 45%, 58 samples	2x
NOT AVAILABLE 4x16GBUNKNOWNBench 62%, 75 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16