Lenovo 82RJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82RJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220321
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 05 '23 at 02:07
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 57.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 259
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 861
80% 666 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3B3A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3251
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 12.6
9% 13.3 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 13.3
13% 16 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L2QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 567 790 627 174 118 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 975
Write 874
Mixed 792
SusWrite 397
170% 760 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 23.6
96% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 306
210% 266 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 103%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 3200 C18 Series Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82RJ Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82RJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback