Gigabyte AB350M-DS3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte AB350M-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 21:18
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 191
65% 117 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 348
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1105 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 35.8
21% 29.9 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 25
21% 25.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 40 47 72 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 56.9
Write 83.3
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 51.7
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.5% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 27.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte AB350M-DS3H - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback