IRU A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemIRU A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock A320M-HDV R4.0
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211025
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 11:04
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 230
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 392
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 397
24% 397 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
MSI(1462 3820) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.2.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 68.2
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 121
56% 84.7 fps
MRender 54
Gravity 79.2
Splatting 41
46% 58.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 390 391 454 459 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 377
Write 290
Mixed 351
SusWrite 418
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 32.7
115% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 173
162% 247 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 89%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
28GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 64 54 50 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 396
Write 256
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 74.4
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 13.2
47% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 21.1
26% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 30.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 24.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: IRU A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback