Lenovo F0DJ00A9US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemLenovo F0DJ00A9US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36F3
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 02:53
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400T-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 188
65% 117 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 485
54% 425 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Legend(17AA 36F3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.9 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 50 122 49 66 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
67% Good
Read 443
Write 350
Mixed 342
SusWrite 86.5
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 26
100% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 193
176% 267 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143SB1-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0DJ00A9US Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0DJ00A9US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback