Gigabyte GA-H67M-UD2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H67M-UD2H  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20101125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 15:39
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 175
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 313
37% 285 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Gigabyte(1458 34FE) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 8.3
7% 9.8 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 8.9
8% 10.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 385 375 422 426 428 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 404
Write 419
Mixed 340
SusWrite 401
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 34.5
127% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 163
152% 231 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 102%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
50GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 12 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H67M-UD2H Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67M-UD2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback