MSI MS-17L5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Crosshair 17 C12VF
MotherboardMSI MS-17L5  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '23 at 08:14
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 72.1
1-Core 183
2-Core 348
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1,045
102% 835 Pts
64-Core 1,554
96% 1,554 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 13C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 154
Parallax 141
124% 149 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 118
Splatting 95.5
111% 142 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA1T0QFM 1TB
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1750 1846 1941 2091 2066 2060 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,477
Write 1,953
Mixed 1356
SusWrite 1,959
382% 1,686 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 35
172% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 381
DQ Mixed 678
466% 582 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 253%
Great: 367%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 56.8
MC Write 49.5
MC Mixed 48.5
147% 51.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 26.9
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 134%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17L5 Builds (Compare 987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17L5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback