Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime14.6 Days
Run DateMar 30 '23 at 19:20
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 166
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 240
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
Asus(1043 845B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 26.3
16% 23.1 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 21.8
20% 25.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$55
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 130 64 64 44 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 418
Write 268
Mixed 203
SusWrite 75
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 9.3
48% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 2.3
DQ Write 31
DQ Mixed 8.7
9% 14 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
275GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 118 137 102 140 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 126
Write 92
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 127
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
689GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 133 149 114 153 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 148
Write 125
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 140
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
64GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 122 131 102 136 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 173
Write 172
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 126
162% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-079.A00LF 99U5471-036.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.3% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 18.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2PV Builds (Compare 2,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV - $78

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback