Jingsha X99-D8I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemJingsha X99-D8I  (all builds)
MotherboardJINGSHA X99-D8I
Memory247.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 03:18
Run Duration380 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 71
2-Core 151
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 621
51% 445 Pts
64-Core 1,744
108% 1,744 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.6% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 117
Parallax 120
104% 122 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 102
Splatting 87.9
87% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FPD001T 1TB
699GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMM0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1852 1977 1999 2011 1991 1960 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,072
Write 1,308
Mixed 1,220
SusWrite 1,965
316% 1,391 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 49.2
159% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 429
307% 401 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 230%
Great: 319%
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 920 428 428 430 429 428 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,495
Write 1,745
Mixed 1,313
SusWrite 510
284% 1266 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 42.4
146% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 528
377% 491 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 157%
Great: 237%
JMicron Generic DISK04 16TB
15TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 23 62 48 67 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 279
Write 275
Mixed 215
SusWrite 54
265% 206 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 0.2
606% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.1
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 0
630% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 35 48 67 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 195
Write 193
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 53.9
171% 135 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
160% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK02 16TB
15TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 35 48 67 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
Read 259
Write 264
Mixed 201
SusWrite 53.9
251% 194 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 0.1
603% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 1.3
674% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
JMicron Generic DISK01 16TB
15TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 36 48 67 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 266
Write 262
Mixed 202
SusWrite 54
252% 196 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 0.1
604% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.1
DQ Write 18.8
DQ Mixed 0.3
650% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
JMicron Generic DISK03 16TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 164 164 164 163 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
125% Outstanding
Read 253
Write 232
Mixed 210
SusWrite 163
285% 215 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 0.3
612% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.1
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 0.2
626% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A4G40DM0-CPB 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 51.8
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 35.5
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 17.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 109%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-D8I Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Jingsha X99-D8I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback