Dell Precision 7510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemDell Precision 7510  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0YH43H
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '23 at 00:40
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65% Good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 157
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 473
48% 391 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake)
Dell(1028 06D9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1338
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 7
5% 9.93 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.9
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8I40100
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,410
Write 1,185
Mixed 1074
272% 1223 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 28.5
132% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 586
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 463
344% 463 MB/s
Poor: 108% Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 13.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 7510 Builds (Compare 2,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 7510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback