MSI MS-17Q2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Titan GT77HX 13VI
MotherboardMSI MS-17Q2  (all builds)
Memory110.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 15:46
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 72.2
1-Core 225
2-Core 428
124% 242 Pts
4-Core 855
8-Core 1,501
142% 1,178 Pts
64-Core 3,475
215% 3,475 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 116%
Great: 121%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7601Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,818
Write 3,372
Mixed 3,084
694% 3,091 MB/s
4K Read 79.1
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 111
349% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,558
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 1,258
951% 1,289 MB/s
Poor: 225% Great: 508%
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$293
3.5TB free
Firmware: 624311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,471
Write 4,496
Mixed 3,533
930% 4,167 MB/s
4K Read 80.8
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 103
362% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 2,040
DQ Write 1,355
DQ Mixed 1,630
1,234% 1,675 MB/s
Poor: 292% Great: 682%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM CMSX64GX5M2A4800C40 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
113% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 41
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 27.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 0R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 8% 85 215 59 144 0" 1536 864
Typical MS-17Q2 Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 236%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17Q2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback