TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GL553VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL553VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory16.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '23 at 13:07
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 34
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 148
46% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 471
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 44.1%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 15E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 6.1
3% 10.4 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 7.9
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.55%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1002 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 167 171 166 168 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 334
Write 160
Mixed 162
SusWrite 167
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 10
52% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 77.1
83% 138 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 46.5%
 Great: 67%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
413GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 120 120 122 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 68.8
Write 109
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 119
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
182% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 54.2%
 Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 10
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 4.6
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 232
17% 232 ns
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 32.2%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples2,838x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples1,142x
Core i7-7820HQIntelBench 63%, 15,851 samples1x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples2,447x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples1,529x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples4x
SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples274x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples249x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples203x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples664x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples313x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples186x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback