Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 71.5 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 149 59% 101 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 340 38% 300 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.5% Poor	Lighting 34.9 Reflection 37.4 Parallax 35.7 28% 36 fps	MRender 35.3 Gravity 36.4 Splatting 25.1 26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 79 80 80 79 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.7% Average	Read 273 Write 84.7 Mixed 114 SusWrite 79.5 30% 138 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 16.5 70% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 81.4 DQ Mixed 112 88% 124 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown - [0x9E02] CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 2x8GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9.6 28% 10 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 8.6 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 98 41% 98 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	1,805x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	216x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	168x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	104x
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples	104x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	76x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $88